Farklı Bitki Boylarına Sahip Çeltik Samanı Çeşitlerinin Besin Madde Bileşimleri ve Nispi Yem Değerlerinin Karşılaştırması

Ayşe Gizem Bölükbaş; Bora Bölükbaş; Muhammed Waqas; Mustafa Salman; İsmail Kaya

doi:10.51755/turkvetj.1473982

EN TR

Comparison of Nutrient Composition and Relative Feed Value of Straw from Different Rice Varieties with Varying Plant Heights

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine and compare the nutrient composition and relative feed value of straw from rice varieties with different plant heights. Straw from three commonly cultivated varieties in Turkey, Vasco (short-stemmed), Cammeo (medium-stemmed), and Efe (long-stemmed), was used (n=4). The results showed that the nutrient content and feed value of rice straw varied significantly among varieties. The highest crude ash (CA) content and the lowest crude protein (CP) content were found in the Efe variety (P<0.001), while the lowest CA and the highest CP content were observed in the Vasco variety (P<0.001). The NDF and ADF contents of the Vasco variety were lower than those of the Cammeo and Efe varieties (P≤0.001). In terms of relative feed value, the Vasco variety (75.05) stood out, while the Cammeo variety had the lowest value (61.71) (P<0.001). In conclusion, the short-stemmed Vasco variety was found to have superior nutrient content and feed value compared to the other straw varieties. In light of these findings, it is suggested that rice straw can be a better alternative to wheat straw used in ruminant rations in cases of good quality roughage deficiency, but the variety of rice straw to be used is important.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi

Project Number

PYO.VET.1908.22.003

References

Abou-El-Enin O, Fadel J, Mackill D. 1999. Differences in chemical composition and fibre digestion of rice straw with, and without, anhydrous ammonia from 53 rice varieties. Animal feed science and technology. 79(1- 2):129-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00271-5.
Agbagla-Dohnani A, Nozière P, Clément G, Doreau M. 2001. In sacco degradability, chemical and morphological composition of 15 varieties of european rice straw. Animal feed science and technology. 94(1-2):15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00296-6.
Agbagla-Dohnani A, Noziere P, Gaillard-martinie B, Puard M, Doreau M. 2003. Effect of silica content on rice straw ruminal degradation. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 140(2):183-192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859603003034.
Akay H. 2022. Grain and straw yield of paddy cultivars and feed quality traits of paddy straw. Gesunde Pflanzen.1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00630-5.AOAC, 1995. Official Method of Anallysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists 16th.edition pp. 66-88. Washington-DC. USA.
Bölükbaş B, İsmail K. 2018. Çeltik samanının besin madde bileşimi ve yem değerini artırma yöntemleri. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi. 58(2):99-107.
Chowdhury S, Majid M, Huque K, Islam M, Rahman M. 1995. Effect of variety on yield and nutritive value of rice straw. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 8(4):329-335. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1995.329
Nakashima Y, Ørskov E. 1990. Rumen degradation of straw 9. Effect of cellulase and ammonia treatment on different varieties of rice straws and their botanicalfractions. Animal Science. 50(2):309-317. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100004761
Rahman M, Alam M, Amin M, Das N. 2010. Comparative study of the nutritive values of the different varieties of rice straw. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 39(1-2):75-82.

Ravi D, IV SR, Jyothi B, Sharada P, Venkateswarlu G, RK RC, Prasad K, Blümmel M. 2019. Investigation of fifteen popular and widely grown indian rice varieties for variations in straw fodder traits and grain-straw relationships. Field Crops Research. 241:107566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107566
Syahniar TM, Ridla M, Jayanegara A, Samsudin AA. 2018. Effects of glycerol and chestnut tannin addition in cassava leaves (manihot esculenta crantz) on silage quality and in vitro rumen fermentation profiles. Journal of Applied Animal Research. 46(1):1207-1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1485568
TRA, 2020. The rice association: types of rices http://www.riceassociation.org.uk. Erişim tarihi: 20.10.2023
Vadiveloo J. 2003. The effect of agronomic improvement and urea treatment on the nutritional value of malaysian rice straw varieties. Animal feed science and technology. 108(1-4):133-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00170-6.
Vadiveloo J, Fadel J. 2009. The response of rice straw varieties to urea treatment. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 151(3-4):291-298.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.03.003Vadiveloo J, Phang O. 1996. Differences in the nutritive value of two rice straw varieties as influenced by season and location. Animal feed science and technology. 61(1-4):247-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00944-2.
Van Dyke N, Anderson P. 2000. Interpreting a forage analysis. Alabama cooperative extension. Circular anr-890.
Van soest, pj, jb robertson and ba lewis. 1991. Method for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nostarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597.
Van Soest P. 2006. Rice straw, the role of silica and treatments to improve quality. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 130(3-4):137-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.01.023
Van Soest Pv, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of dairy science. 74(10):3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
Zhao J, Dong Z, Li J, Chen L, Bai Y, Jia Y, Shao T. 2019. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and molasses on fermentation dynamics, structural and nonstructural carbohydrate composition and in vitro ruminal fermentation of rice straw silage. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences. 32(6):783. https: //doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0543

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Animal Science, Genetics and Biostatistics

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ayşe Gizem Bölükbaş
0000-0001-9550-2449
Türkiye

Bora Bölükbaş ^*
0000-0002-0732-0192
Türkiye

Muhammed Waqas
0000-0002-9972-8426
Pakistan

Mustafa Salman
0000-0003-0828-5998
Türkiye

İsmail Kaya
0000-0002-2570-0877
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

June 30, 2024

Publication Date

June 30, 2024

Submission Date

April 26, 2024

Acceptance Date

June 10, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 6 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.51755/turkvetj.1473982

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA99JG38ST

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Bölükbaş, A. G., Bölükbaş, B., Waqas, M., Salman, M., & Kaya, İ. (2024). Farklı Bitki Boylarına Sahip Çeltik Samanı Çeşitlerinin Besin Madde Bileşimleri ve Nispi Yem Değerlerinin Karşılaştırması. Turkish Veterinary Journal, 6(1), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.51755/turkvetj.1473982

Comparison of Nutrient Composition and Relative Feed Value of Straw from Different Rice Varieties with Varying Plant Heights

Comparison of Nutrient Composition and Relative Feed Value of Straw from Different Rice Varieties with Varying Plant Heights

Abstract

Keywords