Research Article

Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid Samples in Canine Tick Paralysis: Insights and Implications

Volume: 6 Number: 2 December 31, 2024
EN TR

Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid Samples in Canine Tick Paralysis: Insights and Implications

Abstract

Tick paralysis, caused by the salivary neurotoxin of several species of ticks, is a non-infectious neurological syndrome. Its clinical findings are often confused with other acute flaccid paralyses (AFPs). Demographic data and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination, along with routine analyses, can be used to increase the index of suspicion for tick paralysis. Thus, this study aims to elucidate neurological manifestations and mechanisms, offering diagnostic insights to enhance understanding of tick paralysis pathophysiology and inform treatment development and prevention. 15 dogs with tick paralysis and AFP findings were included. Anamnestic data were collected for all the dogs, followed by physical examination, complete blood count (CBC), and CSF examinations. It was observed that physical examination, CBC, and CSF analysis results were within reference values. Unexpectedly, despite the non-infectious nature of tick paralysis, Staphylococcus lentus and Aeromonas sobria were detected in three CSF samples. Although these bacteria are not typically associated with tick paralysis, their presence in shepherd dogs was interpreted as contamination from livestock. Consequently, it was noted that comprehensive evaluation of demographic data and other physical and laboratory findings may aid diagnosis in cases of tick paralysis, including atypical cases where ticks cannot be detected. It was concluded that while CSF analysis is diagnostically important for neurological disorders, careful consideration of contamination risk is warranted, especially in shepherd dogs.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

2022/003 – 01/06

References

  1. Burke, M. S., Fordham, L. A., & Hamrick, H. J. (2005). Ticks and tick paralysis: imaging findings on cranial MR. Pediatric radiology, 35(2), 206–208.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-004-1307-4
  2. Diaz, J. H. (2015). A Comparative MetaAnalysis of Tick Paralysis in the United States and Australia. Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 53(9), 874–883. https://doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2015.1085999
  3. Di Terlizzi, R., & Platt, S. R. (2009). The function, composition and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in companion animals: part II–analysis. The Veterinary Journal, 180(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.11.024
  4. Dunbar, S. A., Eason, R. A., Musher, D. M., & Clarridge, J. E., 3rd (1998). Microscopic examination and broth culture of cerebrospinal fluid in diagnosis of meningitis. Journal of clinical microbiology, 36(6), 1617–1620. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.36.6.1617-1620.1998
  5. Greene, C.E., 2006 - Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat. 4th (eds), Saunders. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2008.00601.x
  6. Gulersoy, E., Kapar, M. M., Durgut, M. K., Naseri, A., & Ok, M. (2022). Evaluation of clinical, hematochemical and cerebrospinal fluid analysis findings in dogs naturally affected by the neurological form of canine distemper. Magyar Allatorvosok Lapja, 144(1), 13-30.
  7. Harkin, K. R., Walshaw R., (1999). Tick paralysis in dogs: A retrospective study of 39 cases. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association, 35:13–17. https://doi.org/10.5326/15473317-32-6-515
  8. Hogan, R.J., Schatzberg S.J., (2019). Cerebrospinal fluid analysis in small animal neurology. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 49:47–65.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Veterinary Medicine , Veterinary Diagnosis and Diagnostics

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

December 28, 2024

Publication Date

December 31, 2024

Submission Date

July 8, 2024

Acceptance Date

November 4, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 6 Number: 2

APA
Gülersoy, E., Balıkçı, C., Şahan, A., Günal, İ., Kısmet, E., Güllü Yücetepe, A., & Oğuz, A. N. (2024). Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid Samples in Canine Tick Paralysis: Insights and Implications. Turkish Veterinary Journal, 6(2), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.51755/turkvetj.1512638