Redirecting to http://dergipark.org.tr/_fragment?_hash=0RmjpO-YiMZc6LC68J2dV-NSrbYip7qmjS7gQVodQ4I&_path=id%3D1473982%26_format%3Dhtml%26_locale%3Den%26_controller%3DApp%255CController%255CSite%255CArticleController%253A%253AesiArticleStats.
Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Comparison of Nutrient Composition and Relative Feed Value of Straw from Different Rice Varieties with Varying Plant Heights

Year 2024, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 7 - 11, 30.06.2024

Ayşe Gizem Bölükbaş , Bora Bölükbaş , Muhammed Waqas , Mustafa Salman , İsmail Kaya

https://doi.org/10.51755/turkvetj.1473982

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine and compare the nutrient composition and relative feed value of straw from rice varieties with different plant heights. Straw from three commonly cultivated varieties in Turkey, Vasco (short-stemmed), Cammeo (medium-stemmed), and Efe (long-stemmed), was used (n=4). The results showed that the nutrient content and feed value of rice straw varied significantly among varieties. The highest crude ash (CA) content and the lowest crude protein (CP) content were found in the Efe variety (P<0.001), while the lowest CA and the highest CP content were observed in the Vasco variety (P<0.001). The NDF and ADF contents of the Vasco variety were lower than those of the Cammeo and Efe varieties (P≤0.001). In terms of relative feed value, the Vasco variety (75.05) stood out, while the Cammeo variety had the lowest value (61.71) (P<0.001). In conclusion, the short-stemmed Vasco variety was found to have superior nutrient content and feed value compared to the other straw varieties. In light of these findings, it is suggested that rice straw can be a better alternative to wheat straw used in ruminant rations in cases of good quality roughage deficiency, but the variety of rice straw to be used is important.

Keywords

alternative forage rice straw ruminant wheat straw variety vasco

Project Number

PYO.VET.1908.22.003

References

  • Abou-El-Enin O, Fadel J, Mackill D. 1999. Differences in chemical composition and fibre digestion of rice straw with, and without, anhydrous ammonia from 53 rice varieties. Animal feed science and technology. 79(1- 2):129-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00271-5.
  • Agbagla-Dohnani A, Nozière P, Clément G, Doreau M. 2001. In sacco degradability, chemical and morphological composition of 15 varieties of european rice straw. Animal feed science and technology. 94(1-2):15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00296-6.
  • Agbagla-Dohnani A, Noziere P, Gaillard-martinie B, Puard M, Doreau M. 2003. Effect of silica content on rice straw ruminal degradation. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 140(2):183-192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859603003034.
  • Akay H. 2022. Grain and straw yield of paddy cultivars and feed quality traits of paddy straw. Gesunde Pflanzen.1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00630-5.AOAC, 1995. Official Method of Anallysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists 16th.edition pp. 66-88. Washington-DC. USA.
  • Bölükbaş B, İsmail K. 2018. Çeltik samanının besin madde bileşimi ve yem değerini artırma yöntemleri. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi. 58(2):99-107.
  • Chowdhury S, Majid M, Huque K, Islam M, Rahman M. 1995. Effect of variety on yield and nutritive value of rice straw. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 8(4):329-335. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1995.329
  • Nakashima Y, Ørskov E. 1990. Rumen degradation of straw 9. Effect of cellulase and ammonia treatment on different varieties of rice straws and their botanicalfractions. Animal Science. 50(2):309-317. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100004761
  • Rahman M, Alam M, Amin M, Das N. 2010. Comparative study of the nutritive values of the different varieties of rice straw. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 39(1-2):75-82.
  • Ravi D, IV SR, Jyothi B, Sharada P, Venkateswarlu G, RK RC, Prasad K, Blümmel M. 2019. Investigation of fifteen popular and widely grown indian rice varieties for variations in straw fodder traits and grain-straw relationships. Field Crops Research. 241:107566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107566
  • Syahniar TM, Ridla M, Jayanegara A, Samsudin AA. 2018. Effects of glycerol and chestnut tannin addition in cassava leaves (manihot esculenta crantz) on silage quality and in vitro rumen fermentation profiles. Journal of Applied Animal Research. 46(1):1207-1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1485568
  • TRA, 2020. The rice association: types of rices http://www.riceassociation.org.uk. Erişim tarihi: 20.10.2023
  • Vadiveloo J. 2003. The effect of agronomic improvement and urea treatment on the nutritional value of malaysian rice straw varieties. Animal feed science and technology. 108(1-4):133-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00170-6.
  • Vadiveloo J, Fadel J. 2009. The response of rice straw varieties to urea treatment. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 151(3-4):291-298.
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.03.003Vadiveloo J, Phang O. 1996. Differences in the nutritive value of two rice straw varieties as influenced by season and location. Animal feed science and technology. 61(1-4):247-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00944-2.
  • Van Dyke N, Anderson P. 2000. Interpreting a forage analysis. Alabama cooperative extension. Circular anr-890.
  • Van soest, pj, jb robertson and ba lewis. 1991. Method for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nostarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597.
  • Van Soest P. 2006. Rice straw, the role of silica and treatments to improve quality. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 130(3-4):137-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.01.023
  • Van Soest Pv, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of dairy science. 74(10):3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  • Zhao J, Dong Z, Li J, Chen L, Bai Y, Jia Y, Shao T. 2019. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and molasses on fermentation dynamics, structural and nonstructural carbohydrate composition and in vitro ruminal fermentation of rice straw silage. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences. 32(6):783. https: //doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0543

Farklı Bitki Boylarına Sahip Çeltik Samanı Çeşitlerinin Besin Madde Bileşimleri ve Nispi Yem Değerlerinin Karşılaştırması

Year 2024, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 7 - 11, 30.06.2024

Ayşe Gizem Bölükbaş , Bora Bölükbaş , Muhammed Waqas , Mustafa Salman , İsmail Kaya

https://doi.org/10.51755/turkvetj.1473982

Abstract

Bu çalışmada farklı bitki boyuna sahip çeltik çeşitlerine ait samanların besin madde bileşimleri ve nispi yem değerlerinin belirlenerek karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. Araştırmada Türkiye'de yaygın olarak yetiştirilen vasco (kısa saplı), cammeo (orta saplı) ve efe (uzun saplı) isimli varyetelerden elde edilen samanlar kullanıldı (n=4). Sonuçlar, çeltik samanları arasında besin madde içeriğinin ve yem değerinin varyeteye göre önemli ölçüde değiştiğini göstermiştir. Samanlar arasında en yüksek ham kül (HK) ve en düşük ham protein (HP) içeriği efe çeşidinde bulunurken, en düşük HK ve en yüksek HP içeriği vasco çeşidinde tespit edildi (P<0.001). Vasco çeşidinin NDF ve ADF içerikleri, cameo ve efe çeşidine kıyasla daha düşük bulundu (P≤0,001). Nispi yem değeri açısından da vasco çeşidi (75.05) öne çıkarken, cammeo çeşidi en düşük değeri (61.71) gösterdi (P<0.001). Sonuç olarak çeltik samanları arasında kısa boylu varyete olan vasconun besin madde içeriği ve yem değeri açısından diğer saman çeşitlerine göre daha iyi olduğu tespit edildi. Bu bulgular ışığında çeltik samanının, iyi kaliteli kaba yem eksikliği durumunda ruminant rasyonlarında kullanılan buğday samanından daha iyi bir alternatif olduğunu ancak kullanılacak çeltik samanının varyetesinin önemli olduğu kanısına varılmıştır.

Keywords

Alternatif kaba yem buğday samanı çeltik samanı ruminant varyete vasco

Supporting Institution

Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi

Project Number

PYO.VET.1908.22.003

References

  • Abou-El-Enin O, Fadel J, Mackill D. 1999. Differences in chemical composition and fibre digestion of rice straw with, and without, anhydrous ammonia from 53 rice varieties. Animal feed science and technology. 79(1- 2):129-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00271-5.
  • Agbagla-Dohnani A, Nozière P, Clément G, Doreau M. 2001. In sacco degradability, chemical and morphological composition of 15 varieties of european rice straw. Animal feed science and technology. 94(1-2):15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00296-6.
  • Agbagla-Dohnani A, Noziere P, Gaillard-martinie B, Puard M, Doreau M. 2003. Effect of silica content on rice straw ruminal degradation. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 140(2):183-192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859603003034.
  • Akay H. 2022. Grain and straw yield of paddy cultivars and feed quality traits of paddy straw. Gesunde Pflanzen.1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00630-5.AOAC, 1995. Official Method of Anallysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists 16th.edition pp. 66-88. Washington-DC. USA.
  • Bölükbaş B, İsmail K. 2018. Çeltik samanının besin madde bileşimi ve yem değerini artırma yöntemleri. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi. 58(2):99-107.
  • Chowdhury S, Majid M, Huque K, Islam M, Rahman M. 1995. Effect of variety on yield and nutritive value of rice straw. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 8(4):329-335. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1995.329
  • Nakashima Y, Ørskov E. 1990. Rumen degradation of straw 9. Effect of cellulase and ammonia treatment on different varieties of rice straws and their botanicalfractions. Animal Science. 50(2):309-317. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100004761
  • Rahman M, Alam M, Amin M, Das N. 2010. Comparative study of the nutritive values of the different varieties of rice straw. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 39(1-2):75-82.
  • Ravi D, IV SR, Jyothi B, Sharada P, Venkateswarlu G, RK RC, Prasad K, Blümmel M. 2019. Investigation of fifteen popular and widely grown indian rice varieties for variations in straw fodder traits and grain-straw relationships. Field Crops Research. 241:107566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107566
  • Syahniar TM, Ridla M, Jayanegara A, Samsudin AA. 2018. Effects of glycerol and chestnut tannin addition in cassava leaves (manihot esculenta crantz) on silage quality and in vitro rumen fermentation profiles. Journal of Applied Animal Research. 46(1):1207-1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1485568
  • TRA, 2020. The rice association: types of rices http://www.riceassociation.org.uk. Erişim tarihi: 20.10.2023
  • Vadiveloo J. 2003. The effect of agronomic improvement and urea treatment on the nutritional value of malaysian rice straw varieties. Animal feed science and technology. 108(1-4):133-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00170-6.
  • Vadiveloo J, Fadel J. 2009. The response of rice straw varieties to urea treatment. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 151(3-4):291-298.
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.03.003Vadiveloo J, Phang O. 1996. Differences in the nutritive value of two rice straw varieties as influenced by season and location. Animal feed science and technology. 61(1-4):247-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00944-2.
  • Van Dyke N, Anderson P. 2000. Interpreting a forage analysis. Alabama cooperative extension. Circular anr-890.
  • Van soest, pj, jb robertson and ba lewis. 1991. Method for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nostarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597.
  • Van Soest P. 2006. Rice straw, the role of silica and treatments to improve quality. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 130(3-4):137-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.01.023
  • Van Soest Pv, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of dairy science. 74(10):3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  • Zhao J, Dong Z, Li J, Chen L, Bai Y, Jia Y, Shao T. 2019. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and molasses on fermentation dynamics, structural and nonstructural carbohydrate composition and in vitro ruminal fermentation of rice straw silage. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences. 32(6):783. https: //doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0543
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Animal Science, Genetics and Biostatistics
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ayşe Gizem Bölükbaş 0000-0001-9550-2449

Bora Bölükbaş 0000-0002-0732-0192

Muhammed Waqas 0000-0002-9972-8426

Mustafa Salman 0000-0003-0828-5998

İsmail Kaya 0000-0002-2570-0877

Project Number PYO.VET.1908.22.003
Early Pub Date June 30, 2024
Publication Date June 30, 2024
Submission Date April 26, 2024
Acceptance Date June 10, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 6 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Bölükbaş, A. G., Bölükbaş, B., Waqas, M., … Salman, M. (2024). Farklı Bitki Boylarına Sahip Çeltik Samanı Çeşitlerinin Besin Madde Bileşimleri ve Nispi Yem Değerlerinin Karşılaştırması. Turkish Veterinary Journal, 6(1), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.51755/turkvetj.1473982
 Download Cover Image